The English Episcopal Conference has returned to teach a lesson estupendísima that The Economist (a great newspaper, on the other hand) summarized as follows (I bias a bit for space):
"- remember that Martinez Camino who perform an abortion are excommunicated" automatically "
MADRID, 18 (SERVIMEDIA)
The 213th meeting of the Standing Committee English Episcopal Conference (EEC) has unanimously approved a statement in calling on Catholic politicians to vote consistency against the reform of the Abortion Act.
The bishop of Madrid and secretary general and spokesman of the EEC, Juan Antonio Martinez Camino, stressed today at a press conference a few points of this Statement on the draft "law on abortion ': threaten the lives of those who will birth, become 'right'. " (...)
" This is not imposing anything on anyone, because of what it is to enlighten, help setting up a fair assessment of what is involved in this project law, which is considered grossly unfair " added.
OBJECTION On the other hand, Martinez Camino, said he hopes that this reform is finally approved, defended conscientious objection to the professionals involved in performing abortion.
"In some laws called 'right' to the violation of fundamental right to life is a legitimate conscientious objection," he said.
addition, the EC spokesman claimed that the reform of the Abortion Act " commits the injustice of imposing a particular sexual moral education, which, besides being pro-abortion and 'gender' is not as effective or True education or as a way to prevent abortion. "
" can not accept the State to impose by force of law a certain moral education to all citizens, this contradicts the fundamental rights of society, parents of schools that have the right to educate their children according to their moral and religious beliefs " said.
Immediately afterwards, Martinez Camino said" the State may not impose any moral or Catholic, and less a morality based on abortion and ideology 'gender', because this will contribute to increasing the presence of the abortion drama .
Finally, the EC spokesman said that the Code of Canon Law contains excommunication for those directly involved in performing an abortion, and clarified that this excommunication " dictates not one, not the places one is automatic and is coupled with that fact " running an abortion.
I liked to be aware of this because I learned a lot of things I thought that was clear, but it is not:
1) The political debate, social and moral preceded the adoption of Act 9 / 1985 of 5 July decriminalization abortion in certain cases, is not exceeded and that is a starting point in current approaches and renewed. It is necessary to reproduce the same debate and identical arguments to those put forth then.
2) The fact that they go to hell who have abortions or collaborate with those who have abortions, because this is stipulated in canon law (not canon) is not something that was imposed by law, is something that is so.
"- remember that Martinez Camino who perform an abortion are excommunicated" automatically "
MADRID, 18 (SERVIMEDIA)
The 213th meeting of the Standing Committee English Episcopal Conference (EEC) has unanimously approved a statement in calling on Catholic politicians to vote consistency against the reform of the Abortion Act.
The bishop of Madrid and secretary general and spokesman of the EEC, Juan Antonio Martinez Camino, stressed today at a press conference a few points of this Statement on the draft "law on abortion ': threaten the lives of those who will birth, become 'right'. " (...)
" This is not imposing anything on anyone, because of what it is to enlighten, help setting up a fair assessment of what is involved in this project law, which is considered grossly unfair " added.
OBJECTION On the other hand, Martinez Camino, said he hopes that this reform is finally approved, defended conscientious objection to the professionals involved in performing abortion.
"In some laws called 'right' to the violation of fundamental right to life is a legitimate conscientious objection," he said.
addition, the EC spokesman claimed that the reform of the Abortion Act " commits the injustice of imposing a particular sexual moral education, which, besides being pro-abortion and 'gender' is not as effective or True education or as a way to prevent abortion. "
" can not accept the State to impose by force of law a certain moral education to all citizens, this contradicts the fundamental rights of society, parents of schools that have the right to educate their children according to their moral and religious beliefs " said.
Immediately afterwards, Martinez Camino said" the State may not impose any moral or Catholic, and less a morality based on abortion and ideology 'gender', because this will contribute to increasing the presence of the abortion drama .
Finally, the EC spokesman said that the Code of Canon Law contains excommunication for those directly involved in performing an abortion, and clarified that this excommunication " dictates not one, not the places one is automatic and is coupled with that fact " running an abortion.
I liked to be aware of this because I learned a lot of things I thought that was clear, but it is not:
1) The political debate, social and moral preceded the adoption of Act 9 / 1985 of 5 July decriminalization abortion in certain cases, is not exceeded and that is a starting point in current approaches and renewed. It is necessary to reproduce the same debate and identical arguments to those put forth then.
2) The fact that they go to hell who have abortions or collaborate with those who have abortions, because this is stipulated in canon law (not canon) is not something that was imposed by law, is something that is so.
3) Similarly, requesting a ban (not approve or allow) specific behavior under a certain moral standards is not trying to impose, but to enlighten.
4) By contrast, decriminalize conduct (or rather maintain an existing decriminalization) and extend the course are not punishable, is to create what is right and is therefore an attempt to impose on citizens to develop such behavior to its ultimate consequences and impose moral standards that lead to such conduct is found decriminalized.
And, as I always told my mother, PROVERBS you learn something . How beautiful everything.
4) By contrast, decriminalize conduct (or rather maintain an existing decriminalization) and extend the course are not punishable, is to create what is right and is therefore an attempt to impose on citizens to develop such behavior to its ultimate consequences and impose moral standards that lead to such conduct is found decriminalized.
And, as I always told my mother, PROVERBS you learn something . How beautiful everything.
0 comments:
Post a Comment